[A different cardiovascular epidemiology].

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular diseases constitute the leading cause of sickness and death in Western countries. They are therefore embraced with much attention in medical research, treatment and preventive programmes for which quantifiable biological risk factors comprise the common conceptual basis. We want to demonstrate that the current narrow biological focus may prohibit a deeper understanding of the sickness expressions. THEORY, MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present paper is grounded in a theory of human beings as self-reflecting and capable of creating and conveying meaning affected by culture, time and relationships with others. From such a perspective, the human body is seen as a lived body, a centre for expression of experience. Two cases are interpreted in light of more recent epidemiological evidence of associations between traumatic experiences and cardiovascular disease. RESULTS Research shows that traumatic experiences in general and early trauma in particular are potent pathogens. Different types of trauma are, however, not consistently related to specific diseases, but rather to complex patterns of so called co-morbidity. These patterns blur the mind-body-distinction and thereby the classification systems for somatic and mental diseases. When such patterns are interpreted as expressions of embodied life, insight is provided into how traumatic experience informs the lived body. INTERPRETATION Correlations between traumatic experience and cardiovascular disease challenge the dominating biological framework of cardiovascular epidemiology. An analysis of the evidence by means of two cases opens up new perspectives. Knowledge about the path from particular and painful experience to particular and painful disease is an inevitable premise for an adequate treatment of the individual. It is also a prerequisite for development of adequate preventive measures.